Related Post:
Hot
- Tante Sachi Narsis Hot Pamer CD
- [Fotograsista]Gadis Desa Cari Kayu Bakar Lugu tapi HOT
- Belahan Dada Artis Indonesia 2012 [HOT]BB
- Koleksi Lengkap Foto Syur Julia Perez di Internet
- Majalah Dewasa Banget Asal Jepang
- Foto-Foto Marika Fruscio, Seorang model dari Italia yang Lagi Ngetop di Facebook Karena Virus Spam-nya
- Cuplikan Video Porno Nadya 'Octomom' Suleman
- 10 Atlet Wanita Ter-Seksi Di Dunia
- Saking Kebelet Pipis sampe-sampe Pipis Di Celana Coy!!
- Parah Cewek Ini Ketangkep Basah Lagi Masturbasi!
- Novie Amelia Pose dengan Lolypop Jadi Lebih Hot
- Ngintip Cewek Ganti Celana Dalam dalam Mobil
- Kecantikan Ai Shinozaki Bintang porno Jepang
- Lyss Valencia Model HOT Majalah Popular
- Tante Tante Nakal lagi Pesta Seks ( Khusus Dewasa )
- Gadis Seksi From Jogja
- Foto Dj Affecta tampil Topless saat Nge DJ Gan
- Inilah Cewek Terseksi Di Facebook
- Foto Seksi Artis Indonesia Cathy Sharon di majalah FHM
- Abg Body OK lagi Narsis
- Foto Bugil Rosie Huntington-Whiteley saat Pemotretan
- Foto Bugil Artis Kim Kardashian Tanpa Sensor [khusus dewasa]
- Intip Payudara Model Adriana Lima di Balik Baju Transparan
- Foto Hot Kimcil Toge Facebook Terbaru
- Foto telanjang bintang Jersey Shore
1 comments:
So the issue here is that al-Nawawi is absolutely correct that the word (كل) is indeed a generalization that is qualified - from his particular perspective of things (which is to see the word "bidah" purely with its linguistic meaning). The difference is that most of Ahl al-Sunnah believe that that word (بدعة) is already qualified by what is in the hadeeth of Aa'ishah (radiallaahu anhaa), whereas al-Nawawi and the Shafi'ite jurists have brought a classification to enable the qualification of what they see to be a word only having its broad unqualified linguistic meaning which is "anything without any prior example whether praiseworthy or blameworthy" Now because this definition would include (in the modern era) your pizzas, burgers, hoodies, sneakers, brick and marble houses, the internet, mobile devices, types of technology and so on, these Shafi'ite jurists simply made classifications to allow these types of things to be excluded from what is otherwise the blameworthy bidah (innovation). Hence, they said there is an obligatory innovation (so we would say putting the Qur'an in digital format for devices and for the internet is an obligation) and a recommended innovation (setting up online schools for teaching of Qur'an and tajweed is a recommended innovation), and a permitted innovation (enjoy that pizza, wear that hoodie and don those cool sneakers). In other words, food, drink, clothing and residence not present in that way before. So it becomes clear after all this that in reality there is no difference between these two groups of Scholars, they all have the same understanding, but are just simply using two different languages to express it. Having said this, we do consider the classification of bidah into wajib, mandub and mustahab to be an error and the truth is with the Salaf and the likes of al-Shatibi w
Posting Komentar